SIG Talk banner

Your choice for woods carry?

  • 40S&W

    Votes: 15 26%
  • 357sig

    Votes: 43 74%

Woods Carry: 40S&W vs. 357sig

19K views 60 replies 42 participants last post by  DetroitMike  
#1 ·
I like to toss out Woods Carry threads from time to time. Folks seem to enjoy them and it's very educational to see what folks chose, why they chose what they chose and what threats they feel they might face in their area. Keeping in mind that neither may be the choice for some, I like to keep it to a couple of choices to make a manageable poll. I'll eventually hit your choice :)

So with that said, between the two caliber choices for woods carry, what would be your choice? And why? If you'd like to toss out your load in that caliber, possible threats and such, that would be great as well.
 
#55 ·
Kind of an old thread but interesting that no one mentioned 9mm.

Yesterday I went to my local gun counter to check on some ammo. They had a few boxes of .357SIG at $72.00 for a box of 50. Not magic, just some hardball range ammo. The same brand in 40S&W was $22.00 a box. Of course I could better both of these prices with a little bit of effort online.

The cost of the bullet that saves you from a bear or lion is a bargain, no matter what you pay for it. The high cost of ammo does have some impact on my practice though. Lack of practice leads to a lack of confidence. I have both barrels for my P239, so I can tell myself that I can shoot the cheaper .40 at the range and "save" my .357SIG for carry. I have done the same thing with .38spl and .357 Magnum for years. A master of self deception.

All said....357SIG and a fat buddy that I can outrun.
 
#58 · (Edited)
Kind of an old thread but interesting that no one mentioned 9mm.

Yesterday I went to my local gun counter to check on some ammo. They had a few boxes of .357SIG at $72.00 for a box of 50. Not magic, just some hardball range ammo. The same brand in 40S&W was $22.00 a box. Of course I could better both of these prices with a little bit of effort online.

The cost of the bullet that saves you from a bear or lion is a bargain, no matter what you pay for it. The high cost of ammo does have some impact on my practice though. Lack of practice leads to a lack of confidence. I have both barrels for my P239, so I can tell myself that I can shoot the cheaper .40 at the range and "save" my .357SIG for carry. I have done the same thing with .38spl and .357 Magnum for years. A master of self deception.

All said....357SIG and a fat buddy that I can outrun.
Fortunately I have a huge stockpile of 357 sig FMJ but non the less, I do use a lot 40 for the range because as you said, it’s cheap. My feeling is that if I’m proficient with .40, I won’t have any issues with my EDC 357 sig. It’s not like I’m practicing with .22 and then carrying 357.
 
#49 ·
I think either would be O.K. for woods carry. I think about having to shoot through the vegetation at a charging 4 legged or two legged animal. The smaller caliber rounds may be deflected by tree limbs or brush. For this reason I carry .45 long colt in a chest rig even though the 4 legged predators are pretty small in my area . I think the chest rig is the best way to woods carry regardless of what firearm you choose.
 
#43 ·
I just got through checking animals out at the barn and I'm missing a pygmy goat born yesterday before the storms hit. They are inside of a 5 foot fence topped with barbed wire around 5 acres of pasture. I walked the whole area and checked fences and there are no breaches, no sign of blood, no fur, nothing to indicate a bobcat or coyote got in. I'm going to go back out there in a little while and see if it was just really well hidden and shows up and then check the back fenced in 10 acre wooded area.

The fences are "beagle wire" which is basically a rubber coated chicken wire, secured at the bottom and I added two strands of barbed wire to the top. If I don't find it or signs where a predator came and went, I'm going to assume either an eagle or a very large hawk got it. I'll take my dogs and probably carry a rifle this time in case there is a bobcat or coyote hanging around that back area. Something is always wanting to eat your farm animals.
 
#35 ·
Either caliber would work in my rural area in a rural southeastern state. Of the two mentioned, probably .40 nowadays as the ammo is more available.

We have black bears and I have personally seen a panther twice, but the biggest threat here would be feral dogs, hogs, gators, snakes, bobcats, or maybe a rabid racoon. I generally carry a 9mm around the farm and a 10mm when deer hunting, just in case I'm looking for a deer and stumble up on a angry 200+ pig. I spent many hours in the woods and swamps as a kid with either a .22 rifle or revolver, usually shooting moccasins.
 
#34 ·
P226 40S&W or P229 357 Sig. Bears and catamounts aren’t a real risk here. Packs of hungry feral dogs are a thing.

P220 45 Compact is my actual preference
 
  • Like
Reactions: rdblackmon99
#32 ·
For me, neither 357SSIG or 40. I am in the Northeast and black bears are the biggest critters. Haven't seen any in NH, VT, or ME but see them regularly in the Catskill region of NY. Ran across one while mountain biking in MA but that was a rare occurrence. The ones I've come across take off pretty quickly. I'm always marveling at the speed.

Most often my woods carry gun is a S&W M&P 340 with 357 mag in the wheel, often Buffalo Bore hard cast. Soooo light, barely notice it.
 
#30 ·
Between the two choices .357Sig with Underwood +P Extreme Penetrator. But I normally tend tomcarry Underwood 45 ACP +P Extreme Penetrator in a P220. I was camoing last year at Cosmic Campground NW of Silver City, NM and did a cross country hike at N55degE for about 2 miles. On the way back I stopped at the base on a ridge in a dusty ground area to take a breath and drink. I looked down and fresh bear tracks right at my feet. I proceeded with caution. This past summer I was dispersed camping in southernn Wind River Mountains of Wyoming (I live couple hours south). Dropped into Fiddler’s Lake CG tomaskmhost about any bear activity. He said he not seen a bear in area in 4-5 years. Next day I was hiking to Upper Silas Lake and was about 1.5-2.0 miles up a trail,that started near the CG. Camp up a ridge untoma flat and there 5 yards off trail was a black bear about 30” high at shoulder. I reached for my bear spray first (was carrying the .45) and yelled. Fortunately the bear decided to run off. I recently bought a P220 in 10mm. Will carry that in Gunfighter Inc Kenai Chest holder. Same one that holds the P220-45 as well. I’ve lived in Alaska as well and once watched a sow with 2 cubs digging up a small animal. She dug up a couple wheelbarrel loads in about 5 minutes. I don’t want to be eaten by a bear, at least not while Imam still breathing.
 
#24 ·
I answered .357 SIG, but the truth is it depends. If I was in brown bear country I'd want a 10mm, but if I had to use .357 SIG or .40 S&W it would be a tossup. .357 SIG is generally going to have more energy, but a heavier .40 caliber bullet would be at least slightly more effective at penetrating the skull (especially with cast bullets). Other than brown bear country, however, I .357 SIG is marginally more powerful and has been proven to stop black bear, wolves, and dogs with great effect. I'm not saying .40 S&W isn't good enough (it very well be), but .357 SIG gives in modest edge in most situations. The one thing a .40 S&W can do marginally better is retain its energy after 100 yards.
 
#22 ·
After living, hunting and fishing in Alaska I only carry a 44mag in deep woods locations. If I’m in a more populated location that has more folks and less wildlife I might opt for a 45acp. Since I have the 44 I’ll usually reach for it regardless of other fire arms in the safe.