The question on the ease of racking a P290RS slide is an interesting one, because I have just been forced to make something of a study of this factor in trying to find a suitable CWP weapon for my wife. She has arthritis in her fingers, hands, and forearms that makes it very difficult and painful for her to rack the slide on nearly all semi-automatic pistols. Generally speaking, the smaller the pistol, the stiffer the recoil spring will be for a given caliber. Generally speaking, the higher the energy of the chosen caliber, the stiffer the recoil spring will be. Many DA/SA semi-autos can be racked more easily by removing the magazine, assuring that the chamber is clear, cocking the hammer, and then locking the slide back. Then a loaded magazine can be inserted and the slide released, loading a round. So, as you can see, the "ease of racking slide" is not only subjective, but also varies across a multi-directional set of variables. In the end, I gave my wife a steel framed .38 Special snub-nose. She can operate the cylinder release and easily fire double-action and there is no safety or slide lock to remember to operate. I find the slide of the P290RS to be reasonably easy to rack, but not as easy as, for example, the slide on a 9mm P226.