SIG Talk banner

What P290RS? .380acp or 9mm

  • .380 acp

    Votes: 4 5.1%
  • 9 mm Luger

    Votes: 74 95%

P290RS: .380 or 9mm

1 reading
11K views 14 replies 8 participants last post by  Goldenlight  
#1 ·
Sorry if I missed the obvious thread out there, as I'm sure this has been discussed. I did a search and didn't find what I was looking for yet.

I am looking at buying a P290RS and have debated the caliber. I like the idea of a softer shooting pistol, though I'm not especially averse to recoil or racking a slide.

I realize the 9mm is superior to .380acp in ballistics. This would be a BUG for me. I'm particularly interested in just how different these two guns shoot. If any of you have shot both, I'd appreciate a comparison. I've also heard the slide differs in shape somewhat.

Thanks for the input.
 
#2 ·
I've owned both. Gave the .380 to my Dad and kept the 9mm.
Both are fantastic, compact handguns but the .380 has two noticeable differences.
One good and one not so good.

The good is the smooth slide action. It may be the smoothest slide action Sig offers.

The not so good is that all Sig did to make the magazines (or clips) is to modify the 9mm magazine with a metal plate down the spine. I shoot a lot more than my father and worried about how well this modification would hold up to hundreds of rounds. I would have liked to have seen a magazine built specifically for the .380 but I suspect that Sig had a bunch of P290 parts lying around and said, "Hey... lets make a .380 version!" and they did.

There is a slight weight difference but not enough to gripe about and both have that long trigger pull that grows on you. As far as handling, I really didn't notice a difference in either model.

I don't think you can go wrong with either so it boils down to personal preference.
 
#4 ·
I have the 9 and love it. Never shot the 380 so I can't comment, but I've handled one. It's slightly lighter, and I agree that the slide would be much easier for someone who has trouble operating the slides on small autos. My biggest gripe with 380 in these parts is that it costs a fortune. For the money and the ballistics, I favor the 9.
 
#9 ·
For my end of it, resale plays a huge role since I get rid of my guns often and don't want to take a bath everyday when trying to sell it. I wouldn't want to pay $1000 for a gun that trades in at $250. Sure, you expect to lose some value. I even expect that my $1000 gun will be worth maybe $600 on trade in, guy puts it out for $900, holds on for a while, service it and maybe gets $800 or $850.

That is fair and the cost of doing business. I could sell it myself and get $750-800 but it would take longer and I'd have tire kickers all day long so my time and aggravation is worth something.