SIG Talk banner
41 - 55 of 55 Posts
I thought our M240B's looked like **** compared to the outgoing M60E3's we had, but looks aren't everything when it comes to performance. (Man, I hope that line doesn't go south...)

As long as the CC9 does what it needs to, when it needs to, and does it exceedingly well no matter what, I'm good with it not winning beauty pageants.

Our second CC9 should arrive today or tomorrow, so now just waiting on model specific IWB & OWB holsters.

Once again, try one firsthand at a range if/when you can. More are being shipped out to more shops, so good luck. (y)
 
The new HK cc9- made in the USA! It has a Modular FCU, American style (button) magazine release, and it has a trigger dingus drop safety. It's a hair taller and longer than the p365, but about the same width:


meh 🫤
No reason for me to purchase one except for the HK name, and that just isn’t enough.
 
I got one the first weekend in oct they were available, just in right place at right time .. have taken to range few times and not one malfunction , it also loosened up quite bit from initial loading. the trigger is much crisper and definitive break then standard curved p365, not as good as my grey gun straight on Wilson p365, . sappiness and recoil on par maybe slightly less then standard p365.
I dont know how to explain it in words but the hk just feels ore substantial then the standard p365.
I own three variants of the p365 and love each one of them .. the people that hate or rag on hk for all the reasons listed above , looks , late to game , no paddle release etc. haven't had one felt one or shot one . this is my first hk so I never had a paddle release firearm so I dont know what im missing plus I like all my EDC to be similar in make up so in the situation if it ever arises I don have to think ( optic, manual safety , mag release etc..)
I am also in a 10 round compliant state so this size firearm suits. my needs and with my hands a standard pinky ext I get full purchase . when I retire and relocate in few years things will be different lol.

I have shot them back to back at range
1 my standard stainless slide on standard grip no optic
2 my standard slide with radian afterburner and ramjet and green mrs eps carry
3 my tuned from wilson p365 with same optic
4 hk with optic
same ammo all wiht similar results in my novice hands .
Image


I didn't over pay.. wiht fees in my state and tax etc I was about 700 out the door .

I just got over holiday weekend the tulster profile plus with sidekick ( I have been enjoying this brand wiht other firearms ) they were one of the first to come to market with holster and with their 30% Black Friday promotion it was 60$ shipped wiht sidekick attachement as well

overall happy wiht firearm and happy to now be able to have in my carry rotation , is it better nobody Is to say because everyone has diff likes dislikes and abilities ( is one car better then another ) the p365 changed the game so anyone after them will be considered a copycat and imitation is the best form of flattery but to have choices and variations is always nice option ..

Image
Image
Image
 
thanks for the review. Let's see and hear a few more reviews out there.
Copied form my previous post on another firearm forum back on 20 Oct 2024...

"OK, our first range outing with the new CC9 yesterday was nothing short of spectacular. My Wife and I shot 650rds in ours without any malfunctions of any kind, and that's without any cleaning or lubing since purchase/pick-up. There were three (3) additional range patrons who took turns trying out the CC9 while comparing it to their Hellcats and "Blocks". They put an extra 60rds downrange with our CC9 and they each stated that they were impressed enough to look more into this new HK USA offering. The ammo ranged from 115gr practice/range ammo all the way up to Speer Gold Dot 124gr +P hollow points (no steel cased stuff in my/our pistols if I can help it).

I can say that there is more "snap" when shooting 115gr ammo, a little more than when shooting my Walther PPS M2 and was the same as the stock SIG P365 we rented at the range. We used 200rds of Winchester 115gr FMJ white box range ammo on steel targets at 7 and 10 yds in fast and slow shooting. No issues/problems were experienced but like I said, there is a bit of some "snap" to it with the 115's. Even shooting with one hand and purposefully using a "limp wrist" did not produce any malfunctions. The CC9's "memory pads" and a proper grip mitigate any shooting discomfort, so who really cares...

The CC9 felt great shooting the 124gr stuff we had from Federal, Winchester, and Speer. 250rd mixture of FMJs and JHPs that all cycled/fired without any issues, and by this point both 12 and 10 round mags were starting to break in nicely to the point that a MagLula was not needed anymore for full loading. When shooting the 124's, there was noticeably less "snap" to the point where my Wife and I both feel that the CC9 is a more pleasing shooter than my PPS M2 and the regular P365. The Hellcat guy on the range also agreed that 124gr ammo shot well and felt the same as his Hellcat (w/ light and optic). Same 7 and 10yd distance but on paper B-27 targets with decent 3" groups. The +P ammo did have some more "push & pop" to it in the CC9 but felt better than shooting the same seeds out of my PPS M2, so I may be looking at a new CCW after more range shoots and familiarity.

Of course, the 200rds of 147gr ammo (FMJ & JHP) was the best out of our CC9. Not only were there still no issues in shooting the CC9 with this ammo, it also "felt" the best. We tried to induce failures with one handed shots, more "limp wristing", and even off-axis/unsupported "gansta' sideways" shots. No malfunctions at all, and the empty shells all ejected in the same arch. I plan on even more 147gr and 124gr ammo this coming week after we do a good striping and cleaning of our CC9.

We shot the CC9 as 12+1 and 10+1 and the mags had no problems fully seating with a single "tap" to load them. Each empty mag ejected cleanly with gusto. The large backstrap worked just fine for me, but my Wife will stick with the medium one. Neither of us had any issues with the ambi-magazine release when shooting with right or left hands, and neither did the other 3 range shooters who also shot with it. No inadvertent mag drops as some of us feared, as the ambi-mag release is in the optimal location. I did have to make a minor adjustment to my grip in order to drop a mag one-handed. The 12rd mag's "pinky extension" is just right for our hands, and the 10rd mag is very serviceable for providing a solid grip while shooting and less printing for concealed carry (my Wife likes either mag for her hands). The sights are great for anything under 10/15yds but I'd personally like a "u-notch" for anything past that. The front sight picture is clear and the front dot is easy to pick up. The lume is bright and helpful in low-to-no light settings, and I look forward to more dusk/night stuff with the CC9. The left and right slide releases will take some more breaking in, as they are still a bit stiff (especially the right side) but they're getting there. The slide locked back to the rear after every emptied mag except for one time with one of the range patrons, as he rode the slide release accidentally during a mag dump. The slide is starting to become easier to rack as the RSA is also breaking in more, but will still be a potential issue for those with weak/compromised wrists. The slide serrations are good, but they are flat/flush without any "wings" to assist charging the CC9 with it's stout recoil spring. No sharp edges on the slide or frame (except for the leading lug of the 1913 pic rail), and the trigger guard is just about perfect (gloves or no gloves) as I have somewhat "caveman" hands/fingers. The combination of the front finger grooves, trigger guard undercut, rear "beavertail" on the medium & large backstrap, the good texture on the grip, and the 12rd mag "pinky ext" all contribute to a locked-in feel when handling and shooting the CC9. We like it, and so did the others.

The trigger... I will say the CC9's trigger is better than a stock P365 and Hellcat but not quite as good as my PPS M2. I did notice that the CC9's trigger did start to feel better as we closed out our range time, so there's a chance it will improve as we continue to break it in. I can't compare it to my VP9SK due to it's aftermarket HKParts trigger & spring, so I'll hopefully track down a stock VP9SK this week for more comparisons. The trigger break and reset was audible and tactile, with and without gloves. Our CC9's trigger break is about as "sharp" as the Walther and better than the stock P365. The trigger reset "click" is a bit less than the PPS M2 and on par with the SIG. Good solid and predictable wall and no "rolling" or "mushy" break. Our CC9 has about a 4 1/2 lbs break, which is fine for us as a CCW. The trigger safety "dingus" is solid and serves it's purpose, as we couldn't move the trigger rearward without squarely pulling the entire trigger altogether. The curved trigger did not cause any skin pinching or bunching of glove material. There is no side-to-side trigger slop or excess movement. Nice little trigger, but I'd like to try a potential flat faced one in the future.

My Wife says that she enjoyed shooting the CC9 and that it's size & weight, recoil impulse, and ergos/shape felt just fine to her. Afterall, this will be her first HK pistol and she's already liking it very much thus far. I can say the same, and I can't wait to spend a lot more range time with our CC9 before it's potentially put into my carry rotation (with a few good holsters). If this thing goes 500 to 600 more rounds of mixed ammo without any hiccups, I'll be even more impressed and buying my own without a doubt. No light/laser or optic accessories were used, but I would not count out a good red/green dot from either Meprolight or Holosun in the future were I to dive into one to use as an EDC. As a CCW/BUG, I could go with the CC9 stock out of the very nice zippered case and action figure-like box. This is a very nice pistol and a pretty good shooter. For it's intended purpose and audience, HK USA looks to have a winner here in the CC9. Don't let the modern appearance/looks fool you (or others) into thinking this thing is not up to HK's high quality & standards. Once the complete (& proper) word on this thing gets out, good luck finding one for a while. I feel the $550 we paid for our CC9 is certainly worth it, so if you can score one at that price or less, jump on it. HK USA did a great job with this CC9, so my hat's off to them. Looking forward to seeing what else they have in store for us die-hard fans/shooters, as well as those new to HK firearms."

Since this original post, we've purchased a second CC9 so I can have my own and these new HK shooters have proven themselves as excellent CCW pieces. I pushed through near 1,200rds through mine and my Wife is almost to 1,000rds with hers, and not a single malfunction of any kind. We're still using iron sights but I did change out my stock rear blacked-out sight for a set of the night sights which work just fine with the front night for me. I have a Tenicor Velo5 IWB holster for mine (w/ ABDO Size C mag pouch), and the Mrs should be receiving her CC9 specific DeSantis leather holster any day as she's using one for the P2000SK for now. As nice as ambi paddle mag releases are, I haven't missed it on this CC9 due to it's size/width. I've got some decent comparison pics of the CC9 and other HK (current) small pistols (w ambi paddles) somewhere... (y)
 
Because the CC9 is smaller/thinner than the VP9SK, P30SK, and even the P2000SK, the CC9's trigger guard profile and undercut area would have to be redesigned in order to facilitate the highly desired and requested ambi paddle mag release. Here's a few quick pics of what I'm referring to...

From left to right is a VP9SK, CC9, and P30SK:
Image

Side view of the same three:
Image

From left to right is a USP9C, CC9, and a P2000:
Image

Side view of the same three:
Image

From left to right is a P2000SK and a CC9:
Image

Side view of the same two:
Image

And to round out the smaller (current) HK pistols, from left to right is a USP45C, CC9, and a HK45C:
Image

Side view of the same three:
Image

Now unless HK USA redesigns and/or releases another variant of the CC9 with a wider trigger guard and grip module, we're gonna have to stick with the current ambi mag release button (which works extremely well for it's intended purpose on this pistol).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tool
I'll buy a CC9 after they add a hammer to it. For now, I think my P365X will meet my needs just fine.
I think if ANYONE made a modern external hammer-fired micro compact (1.5 stack @ 12-15rds) that's not a S&W CSX, they'd have a guaranteed money-maker on their hands. I'd be down for it for sure.
 
I think the day late and a dollar short thing certainly applies here. When your the last one to the table you really need to bring something special to get noticed and I don’t think they did. It’s bigger than some of the others, holds the same amount of rounds WHILE being bigger and doesn’t bring anything new to stand out. On top of that it may be the most expensive one in the category? It also doesn’t help that it looks like a Taurus either.

With that said I do think they will have some success with it once the teething issue are resolved. HK fans will be the majority of the buyers I think, new gun owners will most likely go for less expensive options. People like me that are already owners of competitive guns in the market are less likely to buy another gun that they don’t need and does the same thing.

It will be interesting to see if they try to expand into different models like Sig has done with the 365 but that will probably depend on how successful it is.
Completely agree, HK acted lost for civilian sales and was well aware of the popularity, they attempted to create HK USA, years too late, I got tired of waiting on things that should have been in stock automatically, and its been silly.
 
I think the day late and a dollar short thing certainly applies here. When your the last one to the table you really need to bring something special to get noticed and I don’t think they did. It’s bigger than some of the others, holds the same amount of rounds WHILE being bigger and doesn’t bring anything new to stand out. On top of that it may be the most expensive one in the category? It also doesn’t help that it looks like a Taurus either.

With that said I do think they will have some success with it once the teething issue are resolved. HK fans will be the majority of the buyers I think, new gun owners will most likely go for less expensive options. People like me that are already owners of competitive guns in the market are less likely to buy another gun that they don’t need and does the same thing.

It will be interesting to see if they try to expand into different models like Sig has done with the 365 but that will probably depend on how successful it is.
+1

I love HK. And if I wasn't so heavily invested into the Sig P365 platform I might be interested. But as you stated perfectly, 'last one to the table'. This missed things by several years. With the P365 series I can go from small to large footprint depending on my needs. It would likely take HK years, if ever, to get to that point (assuming that there would be other iterations of the model. And that would be a big 'if').

For right now I'll stick with the USP, P30 and P30sk for other duties and the P365X and Macro for EDC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Twister
41 - 55 of 55 Posts