This has been the most interesting thread I’ve read in forever. I can’t remember the last time I read every single post in a thread.
I think there are interesting points made on both sides. I won’t confirm or deny my feelings about anything specific. However. You had to know a however was coming.
However. I find this sentence to be intellectually dishonest.
“What is the real innovation?”
When Glocks first hit the American market in the 1980s, I like many people turned our collective noses up at the ugly, cheap, plastic pistols with the funny name. Then police departments started adopting them because of capacity, ease of use, simplicity or maintenance and reliability.
They innovated in capacity, materials and safety. Before Glocks there wasn’t a spate of “high capacity” pistols. Glock is the reason Walther, HK, Smith and Wesson and so many others use the split trigger safety. While Glock didn’t invent the striker fired pistol, they may have been the first to put it in a Browning tilting barrel pistol instead of a fixed barrel, direct blowback design.
Glock may not have made the first polymer framed pistol, but they were the first to use it exclusively. And while others copy the striker fire platform, they make a safe, reliable firearm most people can afford.
I’m an unapologetic Sig fanboy. Hell I’ve spent the last two days working the Shoot Sig match at my local gun club and bashing on Glock shooters playfully. Like so many Sig owners, I own a few Glocks. I don’t love them the way I love my Sigs, but I give Gaston and his plastic fantastic their due for changing the landscape of duty and self defense pistols.