SIG Talk banner
  • Notice image

    SigTalk is a forum community dedicated to SIG Sauer enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about Sig Sauer pistols and rifles, optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!

P320 “goes off” again on its own

2112 Views 13 Replies 11 Participants Last post by  DuchessX
** Copied this post from a recent prior thread. **


The attorney who is behind this barrage of lawsuits is being sued by Sig.

Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
Continue to love your P320. People want to blame the manufacturer for their own negligence. Unless that trigger is pulled back by a finger, clothing, etc., mechanically its not going bang.

This may give you a piece of mind:

  • Like
Reactions: 5
The 53-year-old Army veteran claims he holstered his P320, put it in the pocket of his athletic pants, and zipped it up. “All I did was come down the stairway and there was a loud explosion, and then the excruciating pain and bleeding,” he said.
umm, ok. Let me jump on that gravy train, too. :rolleyes:
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Btw, did y'all ever notice that all these P320 lawsuits come from LE and military people? Proves once and for all that just because you're in LE or military, you're no better than the average gun owning Joe Citizen. Even worse many a time.
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Gives new meaning to "Liar, Liar, Pants on fire!"
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Sooooo he put it in a "holster" and zipped it up in his sweatpants? First of all I'd really like to know what holster. Then I'd like to know how someone who should "know better" just ended up being so careless? QUALITY HOLSTERS are worth every penny. Wearing them properly is ever more valuable. Your safety is the grey matter between your ears...
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Even if the trigger or striker engagement is somehow faulty, the firing pin safety should stop it from discharging. There's no way these things are going off without the trigger being pulled.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Btw, did y'all ever notice that all these P320 lawsuits come from LE and military people? Proves once and for all that just because you're in LE or military, you're no better than the average gun owning Joe Citizen. Even worse many a time.
Ive seen so many NDs from higher ups, imho it comes from complacency. Some people handle guns everyday they start getting complacent then accidents happen.

See it with competition shooters quite often too. They focus so much on going faster something has to give and its often safety 1st..... seen it too many times some people will get their finger in there too early and bang!
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Here we go again....... :banghead:
Can we just have a sticky thread that says "Before posting a thread about an idiot having a ND with their 320, read this!"
  • Like
Reactions: 4
Btw, did y'all ever notice that all these P320 lawsuits come from LE and military people? Proves once and for all that just because you're in LE or military, you're no better than the average gun owning Joe Citizen. Even worse many a time.
In fact, the worst fiearms handling I've ever seen was by uniformed military.

From the day I stepped onto the tarmac in Iraq, I was met by a level of unsafe handling I've never even seen among civilians. There was an E-5 sitting on a knocked over cement column, using his rifle butt as a headrest, as he ground his muzzle into the gravel and fine powder sand.

On Victory, soldiers were not allowed to have mags in the magwells. To minimize cleaning, they stuffed newspaper into the magwell to keep the dust out. Why would they need their rifle in a hurry, it's not like they were in a war zone...oh, wait.

I saw a West Point Major - a field grade officer - present his M9, point it right at a contractor with his finger on the trigger as a "joke."

Just a few months later, I saw a USAF O-2 work behind an Army CW-4 (warrant), grab the warrant by the neck, seize the warrant's M9 and put the muzzle to the base of the skull of the warrant -- he wanted to demonstrate the new holster the warrant bought didn't have adequate retention. They had been debating it for ~30 minutes before the conversation drifted to something else, and the O-2 made his move.

I think service members in combat arms are probably very different, but the vast majority of the military are not in combat arms. When a retired two star or a cashiered four star go on national TV to talk about how 9mm and 223 Rem are "far too dangerous to be trusted in the hands of civilians," their point of view is biased by the sorts of incidents I described - some ending fatally. We're not supposed to point out the incidents are a result of poor training, slack discipline, and immaturity on the part of those involved. They also don't care civilians overall, and especially those with permits to carry, have a better safety record or that the rate of negligent firearms related injuries has declined dramatically since 1980 even as gun ownership increased.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Same case posted couple days prior to this.

1 - 14 of 14 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top