Yes, the Short Reset Trigger will fit... is the Slide itself Nickel plated, as the last photo, the sheen matches the nickeled parts. Definitely a keeper!
SigTalk is a forum community dedicated to SIG Sauer enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about Sig Sauer pistols and rifles, optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!
Where did you find it?Finally got it home. Frame mage in Germany, slide in Exeter.
--snip--
Have a photo of the barrel wear?Near as I can tell yes. It's just curious though how the barrel shows some wear and the frame/slide do not. I called Sig hoping they could shed some light, at least on its origins but they couldn't. But while I can't tell for sure much about its past I can see that what I have is in great shape and should last me for a long, long time.
edit: oh, the grips are not original. I do have what appear to be the original plastic ones too though.
I’ve seen this type of barrel wear on unfired Sigs. Kind of weird but something I’ve seen before. Some think it’s from the pistol being repeatedly manipulated such as repeated slide racking etc. Maybe while being on the show room floor at some LGS or possibly a show gun.Here's the barrel.
View attachment 459441
View attachment 459442
Couldn't resist and took just enough Mother's to it to remove the tarnish on the flats. View attachment 459443
I have a P229 40 I bought unfired with box and all the fixings and it had the same barrel situation. Perfect frame and slide and mags still new and in packaging. It is an older AC197XX so from approximately 1993/1994 ish. I feel like these older barrels were inherently more susceptible to barrel wear regardless of fired or not. I have newer Sigs that I’ve fired extensively and they still show zero barrel wear. Not sure if the barrels are different these days or if I just grease mine better. Anyone else out there observed any differences in the way old barrels wear versus modern day ones?That would seem to make sense Maz given that the rest of the gun looks so fresh. The only other scenario that would seem to make sense would be that the barrel was not original to the frame. Though it has no wear on the barrel hood or the feed ramp. Even the mags show no wear. And only one of them showed the slightest marks of being in and out of the gun.
You many be on to something. I'd not have guessed that a barrel could show some wear from being cycled by hand but I guess it makes sense, especially if it wasn't lubed adequately. And over 25 years, if it was going to happen that would be long enough.
New barrels have some kind of DLC coating. It might even be the same Nitron finish as the slides. The older barrels were just blued, which wears off much faster.I have a P229 40 I bought unfired with box and all the fixings and it had the same barrel situation. Perfect frame and slide and mags still new and in packaging. It is an older AC197XX so from approximately 1993/1994 ish. I feel like these older barrels were inherently more susceptible to barrel wear regardless of fired or not. I have newer Sigs that I’ve fired extensively. Not sure if the barrels are different these days or if I just grease mine better. Anyone else out there observed any differences in the way old barrels wear versus modern day ones?