Ok, wow I am not sure exactly why this isn't clear. The MACRO magazine was designed for 9mm cartridges. It was not designed to and is not compatible with .380 ACP aka 9mm Browning cartridges. Not only is the cartridge overall length shorter, the base and rim diameter are different sizes. The case of a 380 is straight; 9mm uses a tapered case. While you may be able to physically insert a .380 cartridge into a magazine designed for 9mm Parabellum, the cases will not feed properly since a 9mm follower will not reliably present them to the front of the stripper rail at the correct orientation. That is why mag tubes and internals/springs for .380 are for .380 rounds, and 9mm are for 9mm. The whole geometry of the feed cycle is fundamentally different.
As to the wording they use, I am not an English major, but I think frankly it is not beyond belief that Sig considers "all P365 models" to be exactly that. A P365-380 is not a P365, it is it's own unique pistol model, chambered in 380. I would have thought it pretty obvious what they meant, but perhaps...not.