SIG Talk banner
  • Notice image

    SigTalk is a forum community dedicated to SIG Sauer enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about Sig Sauer pistols and rifles, optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!

How to build a .22 LR Conversion Slide/Barrel for a P239 .357 SIG?

448 Views 7 Replies 4 Participants Last post by  Willard
How to build a .22 LR Conversion Slide/Barrel for a P239 .357 SIG?

I have Sig Sauer's .22LR Conversion Slide/Barrel for the P229.
The slide fits the P239, but the barrel does not.

Has anybody built a .22 LR Conversion Slide/Barrel for a P239 .357 SIG?

Any thoughts of how to do it?
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
What do you mean "build"? The .22 upper assembly from scratch? Never heard of it. And, I don't think SIG ever made the conversion unit for the P239, either.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
A couple of thoughts.

Don't know if the 'guts' of the 229 slide and 239 mate up, so I'd look there first - as in firing pin block lifter, etc. on your conversion slide.

Breech face, extractor, etc is next place to look. Perhaps there's a SIG 22 barrel that does fit.

I don't have a 239, so I can't help much with photos, etc.

In the FWIW commentary section (smile):

With the P250, the 'swiss army knife' of the SIG line, the 22 slide is aluminum, and the recoil spring assembly fairly weak all things considered. Not necessarily applicable but just for info, the 22 and 380 P250 shared odd sized compact and subcompact modules, and both have shorter slides. 380 barrel is conventional pattern but highly relieved; 22 barrel actually lies closer to the hand. I offer this observation just so you can see it is quite possible that different slides might work on the same receiver... you'll have to check measurements.

Note that SIG chose NOT to create a subcaliber device for the 320 by producing the 322. I have ZERO idea about any interchangeability that it might have.

So as another response noted, SIGs own choice not to make a 239 22 unit is pretty indicative of difficulty vs potential market. But don't let that deter you if you're really interested in trying.

I can't think of any hobby gunsmithing books that would even provide an insight, but if you're a potentially serious pistolsmith, let me recommend Major George Nonte's book "Pistolsmithing". Maybe there's some techniques in there that might help you design / define your project.

Strikes me you could also contact one or more of the folks that make 22 conversions aftermarket and see if they can offer any insights.

Hope this was helpful - keep us all informed on your progress, if you would?
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Nothing to feed it with, ala "Magazine" as a start...

While you can see here, the Takedown Lever "cut" (#2) while close to being correct, the Disconnector "cut" (#1) is off a bit, but even without a barrel assembly, the P229 Slides chin too "low" and impacts the frame's dust cover...

Font Engineering Wind instrument Art Office supplies


Likely one reason a rimfire conversion was never considered, is due to the P239 being designed as a "Back-Up" for Law Enforcement, in the same caliber they carried with their duty weapon. Rimfire "conversions" were a later introduction for low cost training with "primary" weapons.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 4
My point made exactly! Thanks so much for the pictures!

And you buttressed my point about the 322. With a military market in excess of 500,000 pistols, having a 320 22 conversion would make TONS of sense. One way to get all those folks checked out on their pistols, rather than the 90 or so round pistol 'qualification' currently in the manuals.

So if SIG was not going to try to push into that market, it says a lot. And helps explain why no 22 conversion for the 239.

Back to the thought that Advantage or one of the other conversion makers, or one of the custom 'smiths who work on SIG might be your next place to go - knowing that it will be a magazine-up build.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
My point made exactly! Thanks so much for the pictures!

And you buttressed my point about the 322. With a military market in excess of 500,000 pistols, having a 320 22 conversion would make TONS of sense. One way to get all those folks checked out on their pistols, rather than the 90 or so round pistol 'qualification' currently in the manuals.

So if SIG was not going to try to push into that market, it says a lot. And helps explain why no 22 conversion for the 239.

Back to the thought that Advantage or one of the other conversion makers, or one of the custom 'smiths who work on SIG might be your next place to go - knowing that it will be a magazine-up build.
If memory serves me correctly, Jonathan Arthur Ciener may have been the originator of the concept, although there's no proof I've found that he actually designed the Sig conversions. With Sigs propensity to require vendors to not compete commercially with the same products, it does make some sense. Looking at some of his commercially offered models, the design similarity with the Sig units are uncanny. Jonathan Arthur Ciener, Inc. Gun Conversions (22lrconversions.com)
  • Like
Reactions: 3
@Willard What a cool website, by obviously a very cool person!!! May he enjoy his sunset years. But I am sorry that I did not know of him earlier and contact him about building a .22 LR conversion for the P239.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
@Willard What a cool website, by obviously a very cool person!!! May he enjoy his sunset years. But I am sorry that I did not know of him earlier and contact him about building a .22 LR conversion for the P239.
Can't comment directly, but he has been around for years, with all of the various models. If you google his name, there is mention of an arrest, and not sure of the details. Of course his website is current, I guess it wouldn't hurt to inquire about him adding another model.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top