SIG Talk banner
  • Notice image

    SigTalk is a forum community dedicated to SIG Sauer enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about Sig Sauer pistols and rifles, optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!

Glock "switches"? First I've heard of it

2119 Views 21 Replies 17 Participants Last post by  Trackrider54
Glock switch- an illegal modification to a semi-automatic handgun that allows it to fire like an
automatic weapon, capable of shooting dozens of bullets in a matter of seconds.

This is a thing now?

  • Like
Reactions: 2
1 - 20 of 22 Posts
For some people who want to waste a lot of ammo in a big hurry. And probably for some criminals.
  • Like
Reactions: 3
I guarantee nobody caught with these switches was a legal owner of a firearm.
Additionally, I wonder how many were actually prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

Im not sure if its Federal Law, but in Texas, a prohibited possessor should get 5 years in prison.

Id love to see the final adjudication on these cases being cited in this article.

Enforce the law!!!!
  • Like
Reactions: 5
It's been around a long time. First marketed as for "airsoft".
Haven't seen one in real life. My dad facetimed me when they test fired one they took off a criminal.
  • Like
Reactions: 3
It's been around a long time. First marketed as for "airsoft".
Yeah, something told me it's been around. Just never heard of it. Apparently
it's a lot more common than you'd think.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I remember seeing these on Amazon at one point for around $30 and I though it was a waste of money then. Then I found out they were being used on actual firearms and just groaned firguring it wouldnt be long before it was in the news for some reason or other. Probably some idiot being stupid with it.....guess I was right.
  • Like
Reactions: 3
I guarantee nobody caught with these switches was a legal owner of a firearm.
Additionally, I wonder how many were actually prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

Im not sure if its Federal Law, but in Texas, a prohibited possessor should get 5 years in prison.

Id love to see the final adjudication on these cases being cited in this article.

Enforce the law!!!!
I wish all of the common sense ideas constantly being pushed around would include the Enforce The Law part that you mention 🤬🤬🤬
  • Like
Reactions: 1
And yet it’s the AR rifle that needs to be banned, when will we enforce the laws we agree on and stop making laws that only hurt law abiding… someone going to think they want to disarm us so thy can dominate us . Just a thought
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Glock switch- an illegal modification to a semi-automatic handgun that allows it to fire like an
automatic weapon, capable of shooting dozens of bullets in a matter of seconds.

This is a thing now?


Thanks for the link to this story. I guess I've been living in a cave .................... never heard of this modification.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Old news new generation.

One perspective is that they aren't "immoral," they are simply a controlled item - why is another discussion. Europe has a long tradition of fully automatic handguns, it could be said they are just the smallest ranging from Berettas and Walthers up to the submachine guns. All it does it trip the sear when the firearm is fully in battery.

The application is to apply a lot of rounds downrange to control movement in a limited area - and when issued they are used by urban law enforcement in a situation where it's already a developed free fire zone. After the first volley of gunshots its not likely bystanders are still milling around in the way, altho panicked individuals don't relieve the responsibility to target fire accurately.

Adding small bursts of full auto to limit aggressors moving around and to cover a beaten zone is a common and practiced military tactic. Its the misuse by individuals to increase loss of innocent life that we don't want. Its extremely rare - in America the number of criminal actions using full auto in the past was by a very small number of approved users, and most of those were law enforcement. Those are the facts, not that our press currently presents anything resembling it in the 6:00 news. If the last six years and a current court trial are any indicator, the news media isn't.

Mechanically its no different that adding a "link" to an AR15 - another prohibited insert - it will make them fire full auto. The interesting part is that there are trigger assemblies on the market which will legally fire one round when depressed, and then will fire the next round when released. The ATF standard is 1 round per motion of the trigger - so, 1 pulling back, one releasing forward. Yes, you can fan that trigger and empty a magazine in a second or too. Legally. And that is why writing a law specifying things in vague language is bad. 1934 wasn't a knowledgeable time for politicians and firearms, and it hasn't gotten better since they wrote the NFA.

The difference would be "rate of fire." How many rounds go downrange, and the faster, the quicker the weapon empties the magazine. Machine guns are given a "cyclic" rate and it ranges from 450 to 900 rounds per minute. The higher rates require belt feed to keep up sustained fire and often have quirks or issues with reciprocating parts getting out of time, which has to be controlled rigidly or things like a cartridge going off not fully inserted in the chamber happen. Otherwise known as a Kaboom. 38K psi up isn't a good thing from just a cartridge case, it must be contained in a chamber to keep from exploding and directing gas and fragments into the shooter.

Time to remind ourselves why we wear PRF3243 rated safety glasses on the firing line. No, those specs you grabbed next to the grinder might not be good enough.

Here's the "catch": FULL AUTO IS LEGAL TO OWN. All you have to do is apply with the correct form, pay a $200 tax, and once the paperwork is handled correctly, your firearm - or that part - is released from the FFL to you. There are tens of thousands of full auto owners in America, some states more than others. It's not a Federal thing, it's local state laws that control the possession. Oklahoma is a hot spot and has been for decades, no law against it, and the owners aren't the problem. It's those who know very little about it who step over the legal boundaries, and MIL/LEO have carve outs to allow their use, but not you. I was trained on half a dozen MG's and even anti tank weapons, but get a CCW? Take a class and pay the fee, newbie. It's always about control.

One thing is cost - not only the price of the firearm but also the ammo. A 500 round range session can go poof in just a few minutes. It takes longer to get them out of the trunk of the car and set up on the firing line than pulling the trigger. There is also the idea that they aren't as accurate as slowly aimed fire every few minutes, a concept of that target enthusiasts gone Range Officer insist on at some places. My Range Officers usually handed out verbal admonishments if you came back to the ammo bench with any live rounds. The point of full auto is to cover an area of ground, not an individual bullseye. Nobody is getting up and running forward for three seconds while 8 bullets are hitting inside that area. Odds aren't real good.

Machine guns, like politics (and because of it) are much different when you take the longer look or even a deep dive into the details.It's NOT what most people think - and a link or module selling uncontrolled for the public to own? Goes to control - where a few decide who can or can't be allowed to have one. Keep that in mind as you approach the news.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
And yet it’s the AR rifle that needs to be banned, when will we enforce the laws we agree on and stop making laws that only hurt law abiding… someone going to think they want to disarm us so thy can dominate us . Just a thought
There are WAY more people killed with knives than rifles of any sort combined.
Additionally, more people are killed with hands than rifles of any sort.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
One thing is cost - not only the price of the firearm but also the ammo. A 500 round range session can go poof in just a few minutes. It takes longer to get them out of the trunk of the car and set up on the firing line than pulling the trigger.
This quote reminded me of shooting my buddies full auto UZI years ago. We spent
99% of our time loading magazines, 1% shooting. Fun, but not exactly gratifying.
Pain in the......
  • Like
Reactions: 1
The new Chicago typewriter (not that this new generation knows what a type writer is)
A friebnd legally has one installed as a FFL licenced in that class. The gun is borderline uncontrolable.

They did a video of it...


Years back I fiered a FA Mini UZI. That was in the same class. Easily could get away from the shooter.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Another evil invention.. this purely for murder ..
who really want to waste ammos and shoot that fast on hand guns ..
I hope there will be Nothing like this for Sigs .. 🤞
What I can't figure out is why would you need one?

You can pull the trigger pretty fast on a semi-auto. I can empty a 17rd mag in about 4 seconds. I can't imagine full auto would give you any advantages. I've shot a few full auto guns, but they were rifles. It was hard enough to keep a rifle on target on full auto. I can't imagine trying to hold a pistol on target.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
"Evil" and "should be banned."

Ok, prepare to turn in your existing guns as that definition is changed to fit somebody else's view and your's are considered illegal.

The 2A states it very well, "will not be infringed." If someone wants to lean in and insist that military arms aren't what it's about, consider the full auto Puckle gun was already "old" when the 2A was written. It's why double barrels were invented - a quick second shot.

Again, applying personal morality has no place in the Constitution - there is also a clause which states no test of religion can be used for an elected official.

There are over 25 million veterans and almost all of them were trained in the use of fully automatic weapons and unit machine guns - they aren't the problem. It's those who have no knowledge who are. Full auto guns are out there owned by tens of thousands legally. If anything, I'd sooner have a moratorium on beer sales during deer season . . .
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Getting ready for the zombie apocalypse! :eek:
To legally turn a S/A Glock into a F/A one with one of these one would need to be a Class III or SoT holder. Nobody can just buy a Glock switch and legally turn it into a full auto pistol other than properly licensed people. Not now and not since 1987.
But criminals don’t care about or respect the law.
What I can't figure out is why would you need one?

You can pull the trigger pretty fast on a semi-auto. I can empty a 17rd mag in about 4 seconds. I can't imagine full auto would give you any advantages. I've shot a few full auto guns, but they were rifles. It was hard enough to keep a rifle on target on full auto. I can't imagine trying to hold a pistol on target.
Gansta's with 30-something round mags and drum mags. :ROFLMAO:
  • Haha
Reactions: 1
1 - 20 of 22 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top